Executive Summary
March was a foundational month for TRE’s ad account. We launched two new campaigns mid-month — an equipment acquisition campaign targeting sellers (restaurants closing or with idle equipment) and an audience-building engagement campaign — while transitioning away from the original buyer-side Dukers product campaigns. Total spend was $1,101.12 across 28 active days, generating 14 confirmed phone calls at $78.65/confirm and 1,381 post engagements from the audience builder. The strategic pivot to seller acquisition proved correct: the acquisition campaign delivered 8 confirms at $45.82/confirm vs. buyer-side campaigns averaging $92.39/confirm. The engagement campaign is building retargetable audiences at $0.13/engagement, well ahead of the $0.20 benchmark. Notably, by month-end Meta began redistributing acquisition budget — “Equipment Sitting Idle” went from $6 in its first two weeks to $44 total, and “Equipment Removal” from $5 to $26, suggesting the algorithm is exploring beyond the initial “Closing Your Restaurant” concentration.
$1,101.12
Total Spend
28 days with active spend. $39.33/day avg.
14
Call Confirms
8 seller-side, 6 buyer-side. 29 calls placed total.
$78.65
Cost / Call Confirm
Blended. Seller: $45.82. Buyer: $92.39.
51,984
Impressions
Across all active campaigns.
496
Link Clicks
1,416 total clicks. CTR 2.72%.
1,381
Engagements
Audience Builder campaign. $0.13/engagement.
Strategic Context
Account restructure in March. TRE’s account underwent a significant strategic shift this month. The original approach (buyer-side Dukers product ads optimized for calls) was replaced mid-month with a seller-side acquisition campaign targeting restaurants looking to sell equipment TO TRE. This “flip the funnel” strategy targets the supply side — closing restaurants, idle equipment owners — which is higher-margin for TRE’s business model. Buyer-side campaigns (PVM | TRE Leads and PVM | TRE Leads - Copy) were paused around March 16. An engagement campaign was also launched to build retargetable audiences for future Google Ads coordination. This means month-over-month comparisons are not apples-to-apples — March is effectively a baseline month for the new strategy.
Weekly Trend
| Week |
Spend |
Impressions |
Link Clicks |
Call Confirms |
Cost / Confirm |
| Mar 1–2 (partial) |
$52.56 |
1,685 |
38 |
1 |
$52.56 |
| Mar 3–9 |
$253.97 |
8,136 |
128 |
0 |
N/A |
| Mar 10–16 |
$315.37 |
14,133 |
123 |
6 |
$52.56 |
| Mar 17–23 |
$230.08 |
12,245 |
113 |
4 |
$57.52 |
| Mar 24–31 |
$249.14 |
15,785 |
94 |
3 |
$83.05 |
| Total |
$1,101.12 |
51,984 |
496 |
14 |
$78.65 |
Week of Mar 3–9 had zero confirms despite $253.97 in spend — this was purely buyer-side campaigns (Dukers ads) before the acquisition campaign launched. Weeks 3–5 include the seller-side acquisition campaign, which began delivering Mar 14. The zero-confirm week validates the decision to pivot strategy. Final week (Mar 24–31) saw highest impressions but lowest link clicks and highest cost/confirm — consistent with frequency saturation in the Houston geo.
Changes Made This Month
-
Mar 6: Launched click-to-call landing page for TRE. Replaced form-fill funnel with direct phone call path. Phone calls are TRE’s preferred conversion. (Changelog)
-
Mar 13: Launched “Equipment Acquisition | Calls” campaign — seller-focused, 4 ad variants (Closing Your Restaurant, We Buy Restaurant Equipment, Equipment Sitting Idle, Equipment Removal). Phone call optimization, $20/day, Houston 50mi, Mon–Fri 8a–5p. (Changelog)
-
Mar 13: Launched “Audience Builder | Engagement” campaign — 4 content themes (Auctions, Showroom Showcase, Used Equipment Tips, Brand Comparison). $10/day, optimized for post engagement. (Changelog)
-
Mar 14: Acquisition campaign ads approved and started delivery. All 4 ad variants went active between 11:17 AM and 1:20 PM CT. [Unlogged — activity history only]
-
Mar 14: Engagement campaign ads started delivery — Auctions, Showroom Showcase, Brand Comparison, Used Equipment Tips all approved. [Unlogged — activity history only]
-
~Mar 16: Paused “PVM | TRE Leads - Copy” campaign (buyer-side Dukers product ads). Budget consolidated into acquisition campaign due to buyer-side cost/confirm ($75.96) running 2x seller-side ($36.99). (Changelog)
-
Mar 16: Meta billed $70.16 to TRE account. [Unlogged — activity history only]
-
Mar 17: Equipment Sitting Idle and Equipment Removal ads started getting secondary delivery via Advantage+ groups. [Unlogged — activity history only]
-
Mar 23: Meta billed $250.00 to TRE account. [Unlogged — activity history only]
-
Mar 30–31: Meta significantly increased delivery to “Equipment Sitting Idle” ($37.87 in 2 days vs. $6.36 prior 16 days) and “Equipment Removal” ($21.50 in 2 days vs. $4.83 prior). Algorithm exploring beyond “Closing Your Restaurant” dominance. [Data pull]
What We Expected vs What We Saw
| Action |
Expected |
Actual |
Assessment |
| Launch seller acquisition campaign |
Sub-$50/confirmed call |
$45.82/confirm (8 confirms) |
Exceeded |
| Engagement campaign audience building |
$0.20/engagement or better |
$0.13/engagement (1,381 engagements) |
Exceeded |
| Click-to-call LP improves call volume |
Higher call volume vs. form fills |
14 confirms, 26 calls placed in first month |
Promising |
| Pause buyer-side to consolidate budget |
Better overall cost efficiency |
Post-pause cost/confirm dropped from $92.39 to $45.82 |
Exceeded |
Campaign Performance
| Campaign |
Status |
Spend |
Impressions |
Clicks |
Confirms |
Cost/Confirm |
| TRE | Equipment Acquisition | CallsBest CPA |
Active |
$366.56 |
22,109 |
310 |
8 |
$45.82 |
| TRE | Audience Builder | Engagement |
Active |
$180.21 |
9,659 |
709 |
— |
— |
| PVM | TRE Leads |
Paused |
$358.33 |
11,398 |
280 |
3 |
$119.44 |
| PVM | TRE Leads - Copy |
Paused |
$196.02 |
8,818 |
117 |
3 |
$65.34 |
The buyer-side campaigns (PVM | TRE Leads and PVM | TRE Leads - Copy) ran primarily in the first half of the month before being paused. Combined, they spent $554.35 for 6 confirms ($92.39/confirm). The seller-side acquisition campaign delivered 8 confirms for $366.56 ($45.82/confirm) — a 50% lower cost per confirm. The engagement campaign generated 1,381 engagements at $0.13/engagement, building retargetable audiences for Google Ads coordination. Note: the acquisition campaign’s cost/confirm rose from $38.19 (through Mar 29) to $45.82 with the final two days of spend producing no new confirms — a sign of frequency saturation in the current geo/audience.
Ad-Level Performance: Equipment Acquisition (Seller-Side)
| Ad |
Spend |
Impressions |
Clicks |
Confirms |
Cost/Confirm |
| Closing Your Restaurant |
$233.75 |
14,016 |
225 |
4 |
$58.44 |
| We Buy Restaurant EquipmentBest CPA |
$62.25 |
3,557 |
49 |
2 |
$31.12 |
| Equipment Sitting IdleEfficiency |
$44.23 |
3,503 |
26 |
2 |
$22.12 |
| Equipment Removal |
$26.33 |
1,033 |
10 |
0 |
N/A |
“Closing Your Restaurant” still consumed the majority of spend (64%) but Meta began redistributing in the final week. “Equipment Sitting Idle” went from $6.36 through Mar 29 to $44.23 by month-end — a 7x increase — and maintained $22.12/confirm with 2 confirms on now-meaningful spend. “We Buy Restaurant Equipment” at $31.12/confirm remains the most reliable performer. “Equipment Removal” received $26.33 (up from $4.83) but still has zero confirms — the algorithm is testing it but it’s not converting. Consider killing this variant or refreshing creative.
Ad-Level Performance: Buyer-Side (Paused Campaigns)
| Ad |
Spend |
Impressions |
Clicks |
Confirms |
Cost/Confirm |
| All Dukers discount |
$281.11 |
9,977 |
192 |
3 |
$93.70 |
| All Dukers w/ prices |
$206.99 |
6,803 |
159 |
2 |
$103.50 |
| Dukers “keep it cold” |
$42.70 |
2,118 |
21 |
1 |
$42.70 |
| Dukers “fry like a pro” |
$10.72 |
649 |
11 |
0 |
N/A |
| Dukers Carousel |
$8.57 |
428 |
6 |
0 |
N/A |
| Other (3 ads) |
$4.26 |
241 |
8 |
0 |
N/A |
Buyer-side campaigns paused ~Mar 16. These ran primarily in weeks 1–3. Included for full accounting.
Audience Insights
| Audience (Ad Set) |
Spend |
Impressions |
Call Confirms |
Cost / Confirm |
PVM | TRE Leads | Houston Restaurant owners/managers, Houston 50mi, 25–60 |
$554.35 |
20,216 |
6 |
$92.39 |
TRE | Acq | Houston 45mi | Mon–Fri 8a–5p Small biz, commercial property, catering, Houston 50mi, 25–65 |
$366.56 |
22,109 |
8 |
$45.82 |
TRE | Eng | Houston 30mi Small biz, restaurant mgmt, foodservice, Houston 50mi, 25–65 |
$180.21 |
9,659 |
— |
— |
The acquisition ad set targeting small business owners, commercial property managers, and catering professionals delivered 2x better cost efficiency than the buyer-side restaurant owner audience. Both target Houston 50mi, but the seller-side audience is broader (18–65 with Advantage+) and uses different interest signals. The engagement ad set continues building a clean retargetable pool — frequency remains manageable but should be monitored as we enter April.
Ad-Level Performance: Engagement Campaign
| Ad |
Spend |
Impressions |
Engagements |
Cost / Engagement |
| AuctionsTop |
$88.38 |
6,444 |
717 |
$0.12 |
| Showroom Showcase |
$60.15 |
2,489 |
449 |
$0.13 |
| Used Equipment Tips |
$21.90 |
498 |
160 |
$0.14 |
| Brand Comparison |
$9.78 |
228 |
55 |
$0.18 |
All four engagement ads are performing at or above the $0.20/engagement benchmark. Auctions content remains the clear winner at $0.12/engagement. Showroom Showcase picked up significant delivery in the final week ($60.15 total, up from $45.93 through Mar 29) and improved to $0.13/engagement. Brand Comparison tightened to $0.18/engagement — now within benchmark. Meta is still concentrating delivery on Auctions (49% of spend) but the distribution is healthier than mid-month.
Accountability: Previous Report Action Items
| Action Item (from Mar 27 Weekly) |
Status |
Notes |
| Frequency mitigation for Acquisition campaign (expand radius, broaden age, or new creative) |
Not Started |
Frequency at 1.24 (monthly avg) — not critical yet, but rising week-over-week per weekly reports. Should be addressed in April. |
| Split “We Buy Restaurant Equipment” into own ad set with dedicated budget |
Not Started |
Ad delivered $31.12/confirm on $62.25 spend. Still being somewhat starved but distribution improved in final week. Still recommended. |
| “Equipment Sitting Idle” — kill or restructure into own ad set |
Not Started |
Meta increased delivery in final week — now $44.23 total spend with 2 confirms at $22.12 each. Signal validated on meaningful spend. Still recommended to split into own ad set. |
| Coordinate Google Ads retargeting with engagement audience pool |
In Progress |
Engagement campaign has reached ~8,036 unique users. Audience pool exists. Google coordination status unknown from available data. |
| “Used Equipment Tips” — move to separate ad set or let go |
Not Started |
Delivery dropped to near-zero in final week per weekly report. Still getting some engagements ($0.14/eng) but Meta is deprioritizing it. |
Action items sourced from the March 27 weekly report’s “What’s Next” section. This is the first monthly report for TRE, so no prior monthly action items exist.
Recommendations for April
-
1. Restructure the Acquisition campaign into separate ad sets per ad variant. Meta began redistributing budget in the final week (delivery concentration dropped from 76% to 64% on “Closing Your Restaurant”), but the algorithm is still not giving each ad a fair test. “We Buy Restaurant Equipment” ($31.12/confirm) and “Equipment Sitting Idle” ($22.12/confirm on now-meaningful spend) both outperform the lead ad. Splitting into individual ad sets with dedicated budgets will lock in fair distribution. If after 2 weeks any ad set has zero confirms, kill it.
-
2. Address frequency before it becomes a problem. Acquisition campaign frequency is 1.24 monthly average but was trending upward in the final weeks (1.96 per the Mar 27 weekly). In a geo-contained Houston 50mi market, this will degrade performance fast. Options: expand radius to 75mi, test San Antonio or Dallas/Fort Worth markets, or introduce 2–3 fresh creative angles to reset frequency.
-
3. Kill “Equipment Removal” ad. Zero confirms despite $26.33 in spend and 1,033 impressions. Meta gave this ad significantly more delivery in the final week (up from $4.83 mid-month) and it still produced nothing. The messaging angle isn’t converting. Kill it and reallocate budget to the two proven performers. If “equipment removal” as a concept matters, test it with completely new creative.
-
4. Set a monthly budget target. March spend of $1,101.12 happened without a defined monthly budget — it was driven by daily/lifetime budgets on individual campaigns. The acquisition campaign’s $600 lifetime budget is 61% spent; at current pace it will exhaust in mid-April. Recommend establishing a clear monthly target (suggest $900–1,200 based on current run rate) and refreshing the lifetime budget before it caps out.
Budget Summary
$1,101.12
Total Spend
Across 4 campaigns (2 active, 2 paused mid-month)
$39.33
Daily Average
28 days with active spend. $35.52/day across full 31-day period.
N/A
Budget Utilization
No defined monthly budget. Active campaigns: Acq $600 lifetime (61.1% used), Eng $10/day.